Abstract

This study examines the role and application of circumstantial evidence in Indonesia’s criminal justice system and its alignment with restorative justice principles. Using a normative juridical approach with statutory, comparative, and conceptual methods, the research reveals that circumstantial evidence plays a vital role when direct proof is unavailable. However, its application often challenges substantive and restorative justice due to potential bias and unclear legal guidelines. The study highlights, first the critical importance of applying circumstantial evidence within Indonesia’s criminal justice system as a form of indicatory evidence that can strengthen law enforcement. Although circumstantial evidence holds significant potential in supporting the proof of criminal cases, its application must be conducted with utmost caution to ensure that the principles of restorative justice are upheld. The analysis demonstrates that, when applied correctly, circumstantial evidence can make a substantial contribution to achieving substantive justice, provided that evidentiary standards are reinforced, and its use is supported by other evidence that is causally linked and relevant to the offense in question. Second, the application of circumstantial evidence requires careful consideration due to the risks of bias and injustice, which may undermine the integrity of the judicial process. Aligning Indonesia’s criminal justice system more closely with restorative justice principles allows the system not only to focus on punishment but also on restoration and rehabilitation for all parties involved. While circumstantial evidence plays a pivotal role in proving criminal cases, its success in achieving substantive justice depends on prudent, careful, and principled application consistent with the core tenets of restorative justice.

References

Amadi, Alolote, ‘Integration in a Mixed-Method Case Study of Construction Phenomena: From Data to Theory’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30 (2023), 210–37 https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0111

Antoni, Veri, ‘The Position Of Indirect Evidence As Verification Tools In The Cartel Case’, Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 26 (2014), 137 https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16059

Asimah, Dewi and Anna Erliyana, ‘The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)’, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 13 (2025), 708–33 https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520

Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi, Amir Ilyas, Abdul Kholiq and Handina Sulastrina Bakhtiar, ‘The Utilisation of Scientific Crime Investigation Methods and Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Investigation Process in Indonesia’, Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 15 (2025), 39 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00456-y

Botton, Andrea, Gianmarco Barberi and Pierantonio Facco, ‘Data Augmentation to Support Biopharmaceutical Process Development through Digital Models—A Proof of Concept’, Processes, 10 (2022), 1796 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091796

Butt, Simon and Andreas Nathaniel, ‘Evidence from Criminal Law Experts in Indonesian Criminal Trials: Usurping the Judicial Function?’, The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 28 (2024), 129–53 https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231217319

Dobrianska, Nataliia, Vadym Filashkin, Ihor Barsuchenko, Viktor Nikitenko and Andrii Antoshchuk, ‘Obtaining Evidence during the Investigation of Criminal Offenses against the Will, Honor and Dignity of a Person’, Revista Do Curso de Direito Do UNIFOR, 15 (2024), 66–80 https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v15i2.2062

Gallen, James and Luke Moffett, ‘The Palliative Role of Reparations in Reconciling Societies with the Past: Redressing Victims or Consolidating the State?’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 16 (2022), 498–518 https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2042650

Hafiz Muhammad Azeem, Muhammad Zahid Rafique, Mubashar Tariq and Muhammad Shahid Sultan, ‘Truth in Context: Exploring the Role of Circumstantial Evidence in a Criminal Trial’, Pakistan Journal of Criminal Justice, 3 (2023), 08–18 https://doi.org/10.62585/pjcj.v3i1.15

Hari Wibowo, Dodi Jaya Wardana, Levina Yustitia and Hasnan Bachtiar, ‘The Legal Status of Circumstantial Evidence in the Context of Criminal Cases in Indonesia’, JUSTISI, 10 (2024), 716–28 https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.3307

Kirkwood, Steve, ‘A Practice Framework for Restorative Justice’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 63 (2022), 101688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101688

Kutschireiter, Anna, Melanie A Basnak, Rachel I Wilson and Jan Drugowitsch, ‘Bayesian Inference in Ring Attractor Networks’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210622120

Marder, Ian D and Louise Forde, ‘Challenges in the Future of Restorative Youth Justice in Ireland: Minimising Intervention, Maximising Participation’, Youth Justice, 23 (2023), 201–25 https://doi.org/10.1177/14732254221122568

Mardhatillah, Adam Bastian and Ahmad Mahyani, ‘Bukti Tidak Langsung Sebagai Dasar Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana (Putusan Nomor: 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.JKT.PST)’, Mimbar Keadilan, 12 (2019), 59–66 https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i1.2167

Morić, Zlatan, Vedran Dakić and Siniša Urošev, ‘An AI-Based Decision Support System Utilizing Bayesian Networks for Judicial Decision-Making’, Systems, 13 (2025), 131 https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020131

Pangaribuan, Aristo M, ‘Truth, Bias, and Abuse of Power: How Indonesia’s Evidentiary Threshold Shapes Criminal Justice’, The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127251389628

Pangestu, Karunia, Heru Suyanto and Rosalia Dika Agustanti, ‘Application of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Laws in Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 12 (2021), 54 https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i01.a16996

Pujiyono Suwadi, Hasbullah Hasbullah, Anurat Anantanatorn and Tojiboev Akbar Zafar Ogli, ‘Judges’ Role in Suspect Determination and Evolving Legal Concepts’, Journal of Justice Dialectical, 3 (2025), 176–97 https://doi.org/10.70720/jjd.v3i2.98

Rozi, Fachrul, ‘Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana’, JURNAL YURIDIS UNAJA, 1 (2019), 19–33 https://doi.org/10.35141/jyu.v1i2.486

Shamsul, Arefin, ‘Judging the Judges: Inside the Mind of a Judge-Watcher’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5176995

Syauket, Amalia and Fransiska Novita Eleanora, ‘Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah Dan Sistem Hukum Pembuktian Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 6 (2023), 1–7 https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v6i1.724

Teichman, Doron, Eyal Zamir and Ilana Ritov, ‘Biases in Legal Decision‐making: Comparing Prosecutors, Defense Attorneys, Law Students, and Laypersons’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 20 (2023), 852–94 https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12365

Teteriatnyk, Hanna, Oleksii Ryzhyy, Anna Fedorova, Yurii Vykhodets and Vitalii Marko, ‘Activities of the Court to Investigate the Circumstances of Criminal Proceedings and Their Assessment under the Laws of Ukraine’, Cuestiones Políticas, 39 (2021), 195–210 https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.12

Ward, Tony, Bruce Arrigo, Mary Barnao, Anthony Beech, Deirdre A Brown, Jacinta Cording, and others, ‘Urgent Issues and Prospects in Correctional Rehabilitation Practice and Research’, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27 (2022), 103–28 https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12211

Welsh, Brandon C, Steven N Zane and Daniel P Mears, ‘Evidence-Based Policy in a New Era of Crime and Violence Prevention and Social Justice’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 77 (2024), 101940 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2024.101940

Yofhan Wibianto, Muhamad, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih and I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, ‘Real Justice, Real Impact with the Prosecutors in Action’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5 (2025), 1015–41 https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.804